Speaking after the publication of the proposals on the future of the Alex Hospital in Redditch, Labour's Parliamentary candidate Rebecca Blake said:
"Despite the warm words, lets be frank this is a bad day for Redditch. Our local hospital is facing a downgrade.
"There are no guarantees whatsoever that children will continue to be born in Redditch and difficult births will certainly take place elsewhere. A midwifery-led unit where the risks are the same as a home birth is no replacement for the consultant-led maternity department we have now.
"55,000 people signed a petition against any proposal that takes away maternity services. To roll over now would be a betrayal to all those people who stood up to keep services at the Alex.
"2,100 births happen every year at the Alex, because of these proposals only the most straight forward births could continue to take place in Redditch. This simply isn't good enough.
"I have seen no solid proposals that guarantee direct public transport from Redditch to Worcester, to cope with the increased demand brought about by this downgrade.
"Under this Tory-led Government maternity services will be unrecognisable and evening care for children will be limited to say the least."
For more details
CCG
Standard
Wednesday, 22 January 2014
Monday, 6 January 2014
Why are Redditch passengers facing above average rail fare hikes for second year running?
Today Rebecca Blake, Labour's Parliamentary Spokesperson for Redditch will be at the Redditch train station speaking to passengers about this year's rail fare hikes.
Rebecca said "This year Redditch passengers are hit again
with above average rail fare increases. An anytime return ticket now costs £7.10 and I
am worried how people will afford to get to work or to study when every year
the cost of fares snowball. Some fares
have gone up over 4% and after last year's hikes being above the government's
cap, it's particularly unfair that the same passengers are having to fork out
again for above average increases.
With the cost of living crisis, wages are not covering the
essentials and people are already struggling to pay their bills. I want the government to stand up to train
companies who are disproportionately piling on the cost of travel for Redditch
passengers and I will be writing to the Transport Secretary to let him know we
are not happy with this in Redditch.
To read more from the Redditch Standard click here
Rebecca at Redditch Railway Station with local Councillors and James.
|
|
2013 ticket prices
|
2014 ticket prices
|
Increase
|
|
Anytime day return
|
£6.90
|
£7.10
|
2.89%
|
|
Anytime single
|
£5.20
|
£5.40
|
4%
|
|
Anytime monthly season ticket
|
£119.50
|
£124.50
|
4.18%
|
Friday, 3 January 2014
Does Redditch have safe levels of ambulance cover?
Cllr Rebecca Blake, Labour's Parliamentary Spokesperson has raised
concerns with West Midlands Ambulance Service (WMAS) & Redditch &
Bromsgrove Clinical Commissioning Group (RBCCG) about levels of ambulance cover
in Redditch.
"The ambulance service are receiving unprecedented
levels of calls and I want to know when Redditch residents need an ambulance it
wont be stuck in Worcester or Birmingham instead of being in Redditch, especially
when B98 is the busiest area for the ambulance service in the County".
Eighteen months ago Labour Councillors fought against plans
to locate all ambulances in Worcester and we were delighted to secure a second
ambulance hub in the North of the County, albeit in Bromsgrove rather than
Redditch. At that time Redditch had two
twenty four hour double crewed ambulances, a third ambulance giving daytime
cover and a paramedic in a car. Now WMAS
are failing to give the same reassurance.
Unhappy with two written responses received from the Chief
Executive, Rebecca has submitted a Freedom of Information request to try and
get to the bottom of whether Redditch is receiving reduced levels of ambulance
cover.
"After a recent visit to the Bromsgrove Hub I could see
what a sterling job paramedics are doing and under significant pressure. However, to have a situation where ambulances
are unavailable more often than they are available while at the same time
having to take more and more Redditch patients to hospitals further away is
putting patients at unnecessary risk.
For example, if someone had a stroke today, instead of a
taking them a few miles up the road to the Alex, paramedics now have a forty
mile round trip to Worcester which means the ambulance is not available for
longer, but to date no extra provision has been made to deal with this. I have written to WMAS and the RBCCG to see
how they propose to deal with the increase in demand for ambulance services".
For more information from the Redditch Standard please click here
Saturday, 26 October 2013
Freezing Bills Not People!
Labour's plan to freeze energy bills until 2017
Rebecca with councillors Robin, Greg and Debbie in the town centre
As residents in Redditch face 10% increases in their energy bills this winter, today Rebecca Blake, Labour's Parliamentary Spokesperson hit the streets to ask locals whether they support an immediate price freeze for gas and electric.
Rebecca says
"Under the Conservative led government gas and electricity bills have gone
up £300 for the average household. With
the cost of living rising faster than wages people are worried how they will
stay warm in the coming winter months.
“One resident voiced their anger that bills only go up, when the price of energy drops our bill doesn't go down. Another family said they are already struggling to make ends meet and increasing fuel bills are a real worry".
“If Labour win the next general election, we will freeze prices until
the start of 2017, this will save a typical household £120 and an average
business £1,800. We will create a new
energy regulator that protects consumers and businesses from outrageous price
hikes and we will break up the big energy companies .
“However, people in Redditch need help now. So I’m calling on David Cameron to freeze our
bills now. And I’m asking local people
to sign my petition so that the voices of Redditch are heard loud and clear in
Downing Street”.
Friday, 30 August 2013
Syria
Syria came upon my radar during the onset of the Arab Spring
in the Middle East. However, President Assad's
response to civil unrest has proved very different to that of neighbouring countries
and since 2011 the death toll is near 100,000 and around 1 million people
having been displaced.
The 21st of August saw suspected chemical weapons used against the Syrian people resulting in at least 355 fatalities. Tragically, not the first report of chemical weapons being used in Syria this year. While Assad denies that the Government are behind the attacks, America believe that only Assad has the capabilities. Use of chemical weapons is a violation of International Law and America, the UK Government, France and Turkey have been discussing a military response, with rumours of support from Israel, yet Russia, China and Iran standing firmly against.
In my view David Cameron went to Parliament too early to ask for MP's support to back force if necessary. The vote against him will now make it all the more difficult for Britain to do so, should that become the right thing to do in the future.
Ed Miliband wrote to me yesterday stating what the Labour Party will need to be sure of before making a decision to support the use of force:
1) We must let the UN weapons inspectors do their work and report to the UN Security Council;
2) There must be compelling and internationally-recognised evidence that the Syrian regime was responsible for the chemical weapons attacks;
3) The UN Security Council should debate and vote on the weapons inspectors' findings and other evidence. This is the highest forum of the world's most important multilateral body and we must take it seriously;
4) There should be a clear legal basis in international law for taking military action to protect the Syrian people;
5) Any military action must be time limited, it must have precise and achievable objectives and it must have regard for the consequences of the future impact on the region.
I agree with Ed's requirements and I think he was right in the debate to say he does not rule out supporting the Prime Minister. However, it would seem last night's defeat for the Government could see a stark change in how Britain responds to international atrocities. From being a key player during the last century and the start of the 21st century, yet now moving towards the side lines.
For Britain it would seem military support has been kicked into the long grass. However, I urge the Conservative led government to lead on bringing this moral outrage to a swift resolution. Reach out to the Arab League, re-negotiate the EU arms embargo and see what other sanctions can be put in place and most importantly engage with Russia and China. If they will not consider backing a military response what are they prepared to do in response to this violation of international law?
Every possible avenue must be explored, we cannot stand idly by any longer, inadvertently condoning the use of chemical weapons.
The 21st of August saw suspected chemical weapons used against the Syrian people resulting in at least 355 fatalities. Tragically, not the first report of chemical weapons being used in Syria this year. While Assad denies that the Government are behind the attacks, America believe that only Assad has the capabilities. Use of chemical weapons is a violation of International Law and America, the UK Government, France and Turkey have been discussing a military response, with rumours of support from Israel, yet Russia, China and Iran standing firmly against.
In my view David Cameron went to Parliament too early to ask for MP's support to back force if necessary. The vote against him will now make it all the more difficult for Britain to do so, should that become the right thing to do in the future.
Ed Miliband wrote to me yesterday stating what the Labour Party will need to be sure of before making a decision to support the use of force:
1) We must let the UN weapons inspectors do their work and report to the UN Security Council;
2) There must be compelling and internationally-recognised evidence that the Syrian regime was responsible for the chemical weapons attacks;
3) The UN Security Council should debate and vote on the weapons inspectors' findings and other evidence. This is the highest forum of the world's most important multilateral body and we must take it seriously;
4) There should be a clear legal basis in international law for taking military action to protect the Syrian people;
5) Any military action must be time limited, it must have precise and achievable objectives and it must have regard for the consequences of the future impact on the region.
I agree with Ed's requirements and I think he was right in the debate to say he does not rule out supporting the Prime Minister. However, it would seem last night's defeat for the Government could see a stark change in how Britain responds to international atrocities. From being a key player during the last century and the start of the 21st century, yet now moving towards the side lines.
For Britain it would seem military support has been kicked into the long grass. However, I urge the Conservative led government to lead on bringing this moral outrage to a swift resolution. Reach out to the Arab League, re-negotiate the EU arms embargo and see what other sanctions can be put in place and most importantly engage with Russia and China. If they will not consider backing a military response what are they prepared to do in response to this violation of international law?
Every possible avenue must be explored, we cannot stand idly by any longer, inadvertently condoning the use of chemical weapons.
Thursday, 25 July 2013
DO NOT ENTER OPEN WATER
Yesterday
a brother and sister of eleven and six years old nearly drowned at the
weir near the Five Tunnels.
Thank
goodness for the brave & swift action of the passers-by, who rescued both children from
the water, had it not been for them I dread to think what would have happened.
The message has to be loud and clear to children
and adults alike, do not enter open water. Let's learn from this near miss here in
Redditch and from the other tragedies that have taken place around the
country. Despite the warm weather,
trying to cool off or have fun in lakes, rivers & ponds means you are
literally risking your life and endangering others around you. This incident must serve as a warning to us
all.
I know the spot well from childhood and having
visited yesterday I could see evidence that the river bank is well
used. Alarmingly, remnants of ropes hang
from the trees which suggest children have used rope swings to enter the
water. I've contacted the head of
Community Services for an urgent site visit to see how we can make the area
more safe.
The local council cannot hope to make
open water a completely safe place, however where a serious near miss has
occurred involving two children, action is required. Whether it is a sign
warning of the danger which may at least deter some, to cutting back the trees to eliminate the
possibility of rope swings directly over the water, I would
like to see the best course of action investigated and
meaningful, prompt action.
Given that drowning is the third highest cause of accidental death
for children, we must raise awareness that open water is a dangerous place. Even for strong swimmers, the cold, hidden currents and reeds are just some of the reasons that people are drowning.
In addition I take children being able to swim very seriously. Redditch Borough Council delivers free swimming to under sixteens & over 65's and I hope children and young people especially will come to Kingsley and the Abbey Stadium to swim safely and for free this summer.
In addition I take children being able to swim very seriously. Redditch Borough Council delivers free swimming to under sixteens & over 65's and I hope children and young people especially will come to Kingsley and the Abbey Stadium to swim safely and for free this summer.
The weir near the Five Tunnels
Wednesday, 10 July 2013
Redditch to the Royal
Rebecca Blake, Labour's
Parliamentary spokesperson said "When decision makers propose A&E and
Maternity Services will no longer be available at the Alex they are condemning tens
of thousands of people to supposedly travel to Worcester. I want to demonstrate to them the
difficulties in accessing Worcester Royal from Redditch".If A&E and Maternity were closed at the Alex, people from Redditch and the surrounding areas are left with the real prospect of making their way to Worcester for the care they need. To highlight how difficult this will be, Rebecca Blake challenged herself, her Labour Council colleagues and a group of hospital campaigners to use five different forms of transport to get from 'Redditch to the Royal'.
Sixteen people set off from the Alex at 11am to see how long it would take and how much it would cost from 'Redditch to the Royal'.
Rebecca said "My team travelled by bus, while others travelled by car, train, taxi and bike. From the Alex Hospital to Worcester Royal it was a long four hours and three buses. I cannot imagine how stressful that would be if you were trying to get to someone who was poorly or you were heavily pregnant and not forgetting the three to four hour journey home that people without their own transport would have to make.
"Carol Pearce, pensioner from Woodrow, who is disabled did come along and found the direct bus had already left at 9.17 that morning and the next one was not until Monday morning! It speaks volumes that pensioners and disabled people said they wanted to join us on the journey couldn't manage the ordeal.
"I suggest health bosses try the journey on public transport themselves, however just in case they do not have time I will present our video diary to them for their consideration before they close bread and butter services at the Alex and move them to Worcester".
Cllr Bill Hartnett travelling by taxi said "The final taxi fare was £26.48 for one way – I thought that is about what I spend on a weeks shopping bill. The journey took 41 minutes, Imran the Taxi driver was very efficient, however, who could afford attending regular appointments or visiting family or friends in Worcester Royal for £52.96 return?"
Redditch to the Royal
Redditch to the Royal - Redditch Standard Redditch to the Royal - Redditch Advertiser
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)







